Scoped packages begin with a have the format of You can set up the scope for your package in the. If you plan to install a package through the instance level, then you must name your package with a scope. If you plan to install a package through the project level, then you do not have to adhere to the naming convention. Project-level: Use when you have few npm packages and they are not in the same GitLab group.Instance-level: Use when you have many npm packages in different GitLab groups or in their own namespace.You can use one of two API endpoints to install packages: Naming conventionĭepending on how the package is installed, you may need to adhere to the naming convention. Undocumented authentication methods might be removed in the future. If you are publishing a package via CI/CD pipelines, you must use a CI job token.Ĭreate a token and save it to use later in the process.ĭo not use authentication methods other than the methods documented here.If your organization uses two factor authentication (2FA), you must use a personal access token with the scope set to api. For more information, review the guidance on tokens. There are different tokens available depending on what you’re trying to achieve. Publish to GitLab Package Registry Authentication to the Package Registry Watch a video demo of how to publish npm packages to the GitLab Package Registry. Learn how to build an npm or yarn package. npm publish returns npm ERR! 500 Internal Server Error - PUT npm packages in the Package Registryįor documentation of the specific API endpoints that the npm package manager client uses, see the npm API documentation.Package name does not meet the naming convention.npm publish returns npm ERR! 400 Bad Request.npm install returns npm ERR! 403 Forbidden.npm publish targets default npm registry ( ).404 Not Found errors are happening on npm install or yarn.Install npm packages from other organizations.Publishing a package via a CI/CD pipeline.Publishing a package via the command line.Process.exitCode = await ( || ), binPath. To avoid unexpected results, please rename the script in package.json`) Ĭonst dir = await this.getBinaryPackageDirectory(fs, path, cmd, ownPackageJson) Ĭonst pkg = JSON.parse(await fs.promises.readFile(path.join(dir, "package.json"), "utf-8")) Ĭonst packageRelativeBinPath = typeof pkg.bin = "object"Ĭonst binPath = path.join(dir, packageRelativeBinPath) "start-storybook": ,įor (const k of Object.keys(npmBinsToPackageName)) ' is defined in package.json but the 'plugin-root-bin' also defined it. Packages don't have to be added as depenendencies everywhere. When running inside of an individual package. Plugin that automatically runs selected binaries from the root, even eslint-disable import/no-unresolved, */ Any explanations or links highly appreciated □īeta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback. What was wrong with existing approach? I want to be able to control commons packages in one place and define execute scripts per package when I need to. separation of concerns I would like to isolate many scripts per package, there are enough existing use cases (noted in comments above).scalability consider 20 packages in monorepo, won't scale (to me) to handle all scripts in single root file.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |